Just took a quick look through the site and in general it looks great.

There are a few examples of odd phrasing, grammatical errors and some over-use of commas... can give specific examples if you'd like them, but would be worth having a copy-editor look over the content (apologies if you've already had this done!). Small issues like these can be a turnoff and effect a user's first impression.

Otherwise very nice!

Cheers James, this is great!

Font rendering seems off too, a little chunkier all round?

Totally agree! It seems we can have a ton of links to articles encouraging designers to properly price and sell the value of their work, but a company charging a sustainable price for software is called out for being unreasonable.

+1 for the U2412M, good balance between price and quality. Depending on your working style you may want two of these rather than a 27". I find the extra horizontal space really useful, especially when browser testing + code + AI/PS all visible at once.

Are there any plans for a white version of the keyboard?

Any chance of a Ruby gem?

I call this a perk

Like the site, the images and copy are balanced really nicely. My only though is that it could benefit from stronger demarcation between each case study / story. It's a little difficult when skimming to see where one ends and the next begins, but perhaps that is what you were going for!

Web app != desktop app