I like it, the design fits the message.

I think you can work on your claim ("Perhaps the worlds..."). It can be stronger by making a promise to the reader or telling them why they should use it. (Like invision says: "DESIGN BETTER. FASTER. TOGETHER." instad of "The worlds best prototyping tool.")

Also, the screen-capture is a little too fast. It feels rushed and it's hard to follow the functionality. Maybe reduce it to the core function, displaying key benefits.

A tiny, tiny splash of colour wouldn't hurt.

Maybe include a call to action in the header.

Some quick thoughts:

1. The animation moves too quick. I have no idea what'a going on. I honestly had a hard time understanding what the product did until I scrolled down to the features. I'd highly recommend slowing the animation 50%... give people time to digest what's happening.

2. I think you need some kind of branding or identity to help breathe a little life into the site (and the product). There's no emotional "feels" at all, so it comes off as a bit to clinical - or fly-by-night. If you want to charge people for a service, put time in creating a brand or identity they can associate with the $$ they spend.

3. Instead of getting wordy with the features, I'd consider flipping things around and focusing more on the BENEFITS. Features are a list of things the product can do... but speaking to how the product benefits someone is what opens wallets.

4. Be careful with the school/institution logos. It's looks an awful lot like an endorsement or that they are a client. Feels shady. I'd rather see quotes from actual users instead. Right now, this is similar to you putting a Nike, Under Amour, J.Crew and TOMS logo there and saying "used by people who wear these clothes".

Good luck.

The login button is what I would consider to be "microscopic" and very much out of the way. It's hard to reach on a phone or tablet, and it's hard to read for people who don't have the best eyesight. Might want to think about turning that into a larger CTA button.

Just want to say I love how honest and upfront you are about the pricing model. Too many services either hide their business model or charge without justifying their value.

I'd guess for a lot of users your service is worth more than 1$ per month, but I also see how easier it makes for everyone to charge a flat fee.

Some people here have some fantastic constructive criticism. I just wanted to chime in and say I love the service! And I think your site looks great ;)

• Maybe try to add a sticky CTA to the bottom, instead of repeating the CTA 3 times
• its really too grey
• maybe add a demo project (could be a super simple clickdummy, without functionality except of linking pages), so I can check out the features slowly, step by step
• maybe add some visual bits in the header for more personality (desk with fancy shit in the background?)
• the explanations of the features are too long or complicated. try to shrink it down to one super simple sentence (ex: https://www.any.do )

This isn't necessarily feedback on your landing page, but why don't you offer an "educational license" for universities? Universities are known for purchasing products like this for their students. I'm sure you may have thought of this already though.

I think you should make some a/b tests with the call to action, some ideas: - Put one call to action before the feature area - Simplifying the CTA copy (Start your free trial) and mention the 14 days in other area - Change the order: first the CTA and after the copy "Citationsy costs $1 / month and does...."

More feedback here from a couple of weeks ago when you posted about this: https://www.designernews.co/stories/85250-a-service-i-loved-was-sold-and-became-unbearable-so-i-built-my-own

Bauhaus University checks in

One thing I don't think that's been brought up yet is the type hierarchy. The "Features" and "FAQ/About" sections seem to suffer from this the most. I find the headers and paragraph blend together a bit too much. Just increasing a bit of spacing here would probably help out.

Also, it looks like in the Features section something is off about the type rendering. At least on Win10 Chrome 59.Edit: Seems to be due to the lack of a proper tag like a < p > for paragraphs or < hX >'s for a heading, right now they're just rendering from < div >'s.

I liked, good job. ;)

I think is nice and minimals. I prrety good to help the reading

I agree, the animation is WAY too fast. I, however, like the simplicity of the design and the palate you've chosen. It fits with the simple utility you're providing nicely.

My only suggestion is - maybe have a bit more fun with the logo, e.g. (Citation)sy, or (Citationsy), or put a yellow background highlight behind the "Citation" in citationsy. Just something to make it a bit more welcoming, human, and have the logo speak to a function of the site.

I wish this tool existed when I was in school...I wish a lot of things existed when I was in school :)

Here's my take - https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1j74cx5zdwehvc/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-22%20at%2001.10.10-fullpage.png?dl=0

I think everyone addressed what I was thinking. It def looks sort of wireframey- I'd add some color in. Maybe that yellow you used in highlighting!

do this:

a.signup_button { display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; /* border: 1px solid #21a286; */ border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none; margin-bottom: 40px; margin-top: 30px; text-align: center; padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px; background-color: #43d6b5; font-weight: 600; font-size: 16px; width: 270px; color: #fff; font-weight: 700; }

for the buttons and

frontpage_top h3 {

}

logo_stripe {

}

for the header section spacing

:)

also, make the chat button in the bottom right corner: #43d6b5 too.