Ask DN: Popular User Interface Fonts?
almost 8 years ago from Aaron S, Product Designer
Hi guys,
It would be interesting to know what you guys are using as fonts for your web applications?
almost 8 years ago from Aaron S, Product Designer
Hi guys,
It would be interesting to know what you guys are using as fonts for your web applications?
Paid - Whitney, Proxima Nova, Avenir, Din Free - Open sans, Lato, PT sans
I think web application should use native user interface font (San Francisco, Lucida Grande, Segoe UI, and so on) too like a desktop application. This is very important to non-latin users.
I'm using a lot of Avenir, Open Sans, Lato.
Helvetica Neue as well but at really thin weights it definitely affects readability.
I just use Proxima Nova everywhere. Like f*cking everywhere. It just makes everything look good.
Everything?
I've been using Work Sans recently. It was specifically designed for on-screen use and reads well at a wide range of sizes and weights.
Clear Sans is also really nice, but it hasn't gotten any love since 2013. :\
Gotham Rounded
I do like Fakt Pro from Ourtype.
The License is onetime for web, it has a lot of weights and glyphs. It also has a Slap version, so you can combine it.
I like the use of Concourse in Overcast. Its on my "next to use" list
Rebuilding our fantasy sports application, SidePrize, with Blender Pro it previously used Ubuntu.
I disagree with some of these choices.
Given that this article aims to give "standard" kind of typefaces for designers to use, it seems odd to include Roboto and Raleway. Roboto in my experience sometimes makes a design feel very Google/Android-like, not platform neutral. Raleway on the other hand isn't good for body text, and not giving any hint that it's best suited for headers isn't the best idea.
Garamond and Baskerville were designed to be used on paper, not the screen.
Its all personal preference and related to what kind of project we are doing. Roboto works great on headers and large sized copy. So its up to you to choose it for body or headers.
And there's no rules for to use only in paper. Doesn't that look good on screen? I've seen many uses of these fonts which works great.
We're talking about fonts specifically for UI. For example, the fonts used on Medium are gorgeous and work great when applied to a large body of text but they would not be good at all on a tiny screen smartphone device as a label for a UI element. The article you linked is not bad for general-purpose, i.e. non-specific just slap it in and it'll work anywhere fonts, but they may not be great to use as part of a UI.
you can check popular font being used here http://www.fontreach.com/#top
Open sans, roboto, montserrat mostly
I think Montserrat is a bad choice, due to not being very readable at tiny sizes and not having a good selection of weights (see later comments). I think the supposed normal (400) weight is far too heavy. It also doesn't support italics.
Montserrat works great on headers and uppercase letters. But its not a bad choice :)
A good UI font should be flexible enough to work at small sizes, upper and lower case, italics and so on. I know that not many UI elements use italics, but a good UI font should have them. To use a fairly extreme example: making all your UI text uppercase just because your font looks bad in lowercase doesn't seem sensible to me. I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree. :)
Montserrat has 8 weights, from hairline to black.
Correct! Updated post accordingly. Only 400 and 700 are available on Google Fonts which was my point of reference.
My top i guess is pretty standard:
Source sans pro, Roboto, PT sans, Open sans, San francisco
Designer News
Where the design community meets.
Designer News is a large, global community of people working or interested in design and technology.
Have feedback?
Login to Comment
You'll need to log in before you can leave a comment.
LoginRegister Today
New accounts can leave comments immediately, and gain full permissions after one week.
Register now